violent ethnic unrest sporadically flares up among the Uyghur and Tibetans; the population is aging at a troubling rate thanks to the one-child policy; selective abortion has created a dangerous imbalance of young men in parts of the country; corruption is rife; an angry nationalism is percolating among the disenfranchised; vast areas appear on the verge of ecological collapse; climate change could seriously undermine food security; the stock exchange, according to one economist I met, is “a gaming casino;” there aren’t enough good jobs for millions of graduates; many state-owned enterprises remain stubbornly inefficient; easy credit, politicized lending and murky balance sheets threaten the stability of the banking system. Many of these problems are interconnected so that a crisis in one area could spill over into others, potentially leading to widespread social breakdown. The Communist Party thus maintains a seemingly iron grip, recognizing that it faces stresses unimaginable to the Manchus a century ago.
[...] remember the many covers done by magazine’s like the Times and the Economist going on about how China was a fragile empire. One that was rising too quickly and would soon [...]
With all the problems you accurately mention, you do not mention the most important one, a total lack of spirituality and morality. And with no way to vent frustrations, tens and hundreds of millions of Chinese seek spiritual comfort in underground religion. That will be the source of the collapse.
Parallels are easy to draw between carefully selected elements of history, especially when one has a preconceived political agenda that one wishes to substantiate. I can certainly respect your personal experiences from your travels in the Middle Kingdom. However it is clear that despite your travels, you clearly lack (or choose to ignore) a real understanding of the historical context of the Qings’ overthrow. Surely you’re familiar with the century of abuse and exploitation of the Chinese nation at the hands of Western imperial powers under the watch of Qing rulers. And surely you’re also familiar that the native Han inhabitants had resented through four centuries the rule of the hated Manchu. The overiding factor behind the removal of China’s last imperial dynasty was the perception that it was weak and had outlasted its usefulness. Indeed, it had attempted to modernize “too late, too little.” So long as the Communist Party continues to raise the standard of living of its citizens and protect its interest from “foreign invaders” and hegemonists, the people will tolerate its continued rule. This has been the case through 4000 years of history, and as you so astutely point out, no one is better than the Chinese to learn the lessons from its history.
Tan vincent855 ecrit:
Je ne me montre pas du tout inquiet au sujet de ‘China Rise’ comme la plupart des articles ecrites par les memes Occidentaux (Westeners writers)qui ont tendance a s’enfermer dans leur pensee unique (one-thinking),celle de s habituer de la domination du monde par le meme SuperPower.
For the next decades, nous assisterons a la montee continuelle en puissance de la Chine et egalement au renforcement de l Union europeene (EU)et eventuellement a l entree en scene internationale des Nations emergentes (NATEMs)- un monde plus equilibre doit etre multi-polaire.
Eric does it again. Seeing China in focus.